All Genesis myths were presented to make them appear as sequential happenings, but they are really parallel tales that personify aspects of the Creation processes. The story of Noah, the “Flood,” and the ark is undoubtedly the most obvious mythic presentation. The story of Noah appears in Genesis, the book of beginnings, from chapters five through ten. Chapter five begins, “This is the book of the generations of Adam,” and quickly moves from Seth, Adam and Eve’s last son, through an alleged genealogy listing to Methuselah and his son Lamech who “begat” Noah. Methuselah is presented as having lived 969 years, and his son Lamech lived 182 years. Thus is the illusion of time accounted for in mythological staging.
Noah, in many respects, is cast as the second Adam. By chapter 6:9 God found Noah to be “…a just man and righteous in his generations…” Some translations say he was perfect in his generations. “In his generations” is the sacred language way to represent the energies that involve to produce formations in which life is to take on its creative potential. This is why in the next verse it is quickly added that Noah walked with God, which is the mythographers’ way of stressing that the story is set in the primordial stages of Creation. But God allegedly judged the whole earth to be corrupt and filled with violence: which really refers to the violent energy aspects issuing out of Source which function as an amoral creative power and therefore the prototypes of planetary formation are yet to be established as the supportive means of matter manifestation.
The cleansing “Flood” of the Noah myth explains in an entertainment way the condensing of electrodynamics configurations that flood out of Source and are borne into visibility. This process of Creation forces can be assessed as the rescuing and delivering element that is buoyed upon unlimited waters (primal energies). This rescuing and delivering element has served as the motivation for over four hundred myths of world inundation in which chosen ones were carried in an ark, chest or ship to be cast upon the summit of matter. Hindu myth has the vessel Argha; Greek myth has the Cista or the Argo; scriptural myth calls it the ark—a word borrowed from Egyptian language, etc. The Life Principle is borne into matter, and this development is then personified with regional names. In Babylonian myth the Life Principle is personified as Utnapishtim; to the Persians it was Yima; the Chaldeans knew it as Xesuthras; the Greeks named it Deucalion; the Hindu version was Vaivasvata; the Mexican personification was Nata; and the Hebrew myth personified it as Noah. Unfortunately, not even the name Noah is original with the Hebrews; it was taken from the Chaldean name Nuah, which served to identify the third person of the Chaldean Trinity as well as being the third sign of their Zodiac.
The “Flood”of Hebrew scriptures is said to have occurred in Noah’s 600th year (Genesis 7:11). The number six has a tradition of representing perfection and/or fulfillment. God created all things in six days, for example. Noah, like Adam and other starring characters of Genesis, is one of the many personifications of the Life Principle that is used throughout Genesis, only this time it dramatizes its movement upon the violent aspects of the Creation energies that flood out of Source toward manifestation as matter. And as with Adam, God’s first command to Noah and his sons after the flood (Genesis 9:1) is exactly the same as the command to Adam and Eve: Be fruitful, and multiply, and replenish the earth.
The highlight of the Noah tale is his implied fall from grace, which occurs very soon after touching upon Mount Ararat (solid matter). The first thing that Noah allegedly did, beside build an altar and offer up prayers of thanksgiving, was to plant a vine which, by evening, had borne fruit from which Noah had already made potent wine. Perhaps all he did was transplant a mature vine carried in the ark, and yet there is still the problem of making a full-bodied wine by evening. Anyway, Noah got blotto-drunk. In other words, primal energies have been transformed into the “wine of life” and Noah becoming intoxicated signifies his embodiment of matter life. This is identical in meaning as other Genesis characters, Jacob for instance, falling asleep and thereafter assuming a new identity (Israel/matter). In this version, however, the Noah character personifies planetary life.
As the energy manifestation as a new planetary identity, he is portrayed as in a stupor with life and is naked. The story element of his sons walking backwards to cover their father’s nakedness simply personifies the planet being clothed with vegetation. His sons, Japheth and Shem, represent the still manifesting pre-physical energy elements with which the Life Principle is clothed as matter, which is why the sons are said to move backwards to do it (Genesis 9:23)—they cannot yet see the evolutionary results of their actions. Feeling himself being lightly covered, “Noah awoke from his wine, and knew what his little son had done unto him.” (Genesis 9:24) Discovering someone naked is not something that is done to them. If things have seemed a little strange so far, it now becomes bizarre. Noah’s “little son” is cursed by Noah for accidentally seeing Noah naked. But it is the grandson of Noah, named Canaan, son of Ham, who receives the curse! Something is being covered up here, and it isn’t Noah.
There are a number of myths from different ancient cultures with a similar plotline, but they adhered more closely to scientific principles of the creative process in their telling. In those myths the elder god, as he lay sleeping, is castrated by his youngest son. In Greek myth, for example, the young god Cronos (personified time, which is relative only to the matter plane) castrated his sleeping father Uranus (personification of first light that attends elementary conditions). In an older scriptural version, Noah suffered the same fate of castration by his son Ham, but this was purged from “revealed” word;—and in the process the meaning of matter elements being severed from primordial conditions was removed and replaced with the absurd sense of false shame for being seen in the natural state. God hadn’t seen anything wrong with nakedness in the Garden of Eden. The priest-authors attempted some originality in their desperation to clean up the borrowed myth elements, which is why the grandson, who had not seen Noah naked, illogically wound up receiving the curse. The curse laid upon Canaan was that he was condemned to be the servant to his uncles Shem and Japheth. If any logic can be said to be found in this, it is that the grandson of Noah personifies the next developmental phase in lifeforms, thus figuratively he “serves” them by continuing the energy process into matter.
Noah’s tale then gets a quick conclusion, saying that he lived 350 years after the Flood and died at the age of 950.
Related post: Possible Background of Flood Myths