Dangers of Bible-Modeled Government
In the recent timeframe of 2005 at least a dozen evangelical leadership programs had wormed their way into Washington DC power ranks, and they were asserting, “Christian men and women…will lead our nation with timeless biblical values…” As these blog posts and the book Time Frames and Taboo Data have investigated, those “biblical values” are distinguished by their page after page celebration of deceptions, assassinations, wars, unproven claims of entitlement, unfulfilled “covenants,” etc.
Nonetheless, the ideal, the evangelical leadership programmers were asserting, was to develop leaders “who read the Bible as a blueprint.” Considering the constant violence that attends so much of priest-written “history,” these evangelical programmers seemed to be advocating a return to indulging in heavy prejudice, reestablishment of slavery, upgrading the practice of passing personal responsibility onto others, terrorizing anyone who lives their lives differently than evangelicals, even warring and terrorizing to acquire some desirable lands, etc. Said one student aide who was taking one of the evangelical leadership programs, “(they, the programmers) give you an intellectual consistency. Yeah, sure.
And as usual those championing use of the Bible as a blueprint for government were insisting that the founding fathers of the United States had been guided by Christian principles in designing the concept of a nation governed by democratic principles. That is verifiably untrue. We should remember that not one highly organized religion of the world has ever suggested that Heaven or Paradise operated on democratic principles; Heaven or Paradise is a kingdom, where God sits on a throne, everyone behaves as robots, and the blessed ones who are allowed into Heaven must eternally stroke God’s ego with constant hallelujahs. As for the men who envisioned a more compassionate and self-respecting means of human and humane governing, they studied the history of world governments. The alarming true history from every nation was of tyranny and disasters in governments, and the repeated source of those imbalanced and more brutal ruling systems were shown to commonly trace back to enforced religious concepts. European history, from the Dark Ages into 1700s contemporary times, sent up warning flags that church and state must be kept separate for man to experience equality. Thus in the treaty between Britain and the Americans, which officially ended the War of Independence but was not finalized until 1797, there is a declaration of spiritual independence as well. It is stated in Article 11 of that document, the Treaty of Tripoli, and it boldly proclaims: “The government of the United States is not in any sense founded on the Christian religion.”
That is true history: but the religionists continue to hammer away at the premise that “federal laws should be based on biblical precepts.” In doing so they deliberately refuse to acknowledge the monumental errors and contradictions, as well as the perverted “history,” that make up the books of the Bible. While ignoring such facts, the Bible-thumpers insist that it is they who have the obligation to “try to arrest our society’s moral decay.” And to accomplish that, they make every effort to place into government posts those “steadfast politicians” that “will be unwilling to compromise” when dealing with the complex issues of social intercourse. In other words, force a theocracy upon the nation. (For related events c. 2004-05 see recent post, Religious Right Strategy for Taking Political Control, Nov. 2010.)
At the top of the evangelical leadership programmers’ must-do-list in the 2005 timeframe—it was even called “a Christian imperative—was to abolish the Department of Education! Indeed, the Republican Representative from North Carolina thought such plans were divinely guided, and judged the evangelical leadership classes as “doing the Lord’s work.” In his view, using democratic rights to gnaw away at the roots of democracy made for “steadfast politicians.” The North Carolina Representative’s assessment of the religious fervor was that if politicians did not take their cue from God then “our morality will crumble.” In that case, he warned, we would no longer recognize America.
It is a certainty that the United States of America would no longer be recognizable under a theocratic or dictatorship form of government.
December 28, 2010 at 10:11 am
Much of the discussion missed the documents main thrust…One leader in an op-ed published the day before the documents release claimed that it was some kind of power play by which new leadership was staking a claim with different emphases from the traditional mainstream evangelical movement. ..Actually the steering committee and charter signatories are hardly new faces. Both CTs board chair and editor in chief served on the steering committee. They signed as individuals but they collectively represent centuries of mainstream evangelical leadership…The op-eds author clearly had a politicized vision of the mainstream evangelical movement. And that is indeed part of the problem.
December 30, 2010 at 8:39 pm
Unfortunately, those “centuries of evangelical leadership” have rarely shown concern for anything other than their indoctrinization system.
December 31, 2010 at 6:16 am
woot, thankyou! I finally came to a site where the webmaster knows what they’re talking about. Do you know how many results are in Google when I search.. too many! It’s so annoying having to go from page after page after page, wasting my day away with thousands of people just copying eachother’s articles… bah. Anyway, thankyou very much for the info anyway, much appreciated.